such that your review can be easily updated in the future with new research findings. Part 3: Pearls and Pitfalls of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews. It should end with a summary statement of the aims The methodology should follow a clear structure, looking at inclusion/exclusion characteristics, how studies were indentified, how studies included were handled, data extraction and quality assessment The result… Define your terminology. This diagram illustrates in a visual way and in plain language what review authors actually do in the process of undertaking a systematic review. Identify the appropriate index terms (subject headings) for your topic.. Index terms differ by database (MeSH, or Medical Subject Headings, Emtree terms, Subject headings) are assigned by experts based on the article's content. Taking these four actions accomplishes four goals: (1) Creating a clear understanding of how you will evaluate each study. Select studies per protocol. Well, I was thinking about it, but I’m not sure. 2020 Nov 24;17(23):8728. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238728. Retrieved September 18, 2018, from http://tamu.libguides.com/c.php?g=574702&p=4298724. Syst Rev. Some journals require you to submit your protocol along with your manuscript. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. PRISMA; PROSPERO; evidence-based medicine; meta-analysis; systematic review. Garcia FL, Williams BT, Polce EM, Heller DB, Aman ZS, Nwachukwu BU, Nho SJ, Chahla J. Orthop J Sports Med. Evaluating the Characteristics, Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture for Low Back Pain by Using the Veritas Plot. Purpose: HHS NIH Before we go on to tell you as to what are the best tips to keep in mind while writing a systematic literature review, let us tell you, it must have certain things conveyed. Resources for conducting a systematic review research. There are 27 items on the checklist. 2020 Aug 21;2(5):e655-e660. Epub 2017 Apr 27. Systematic reviews follow the same structure as original research articles. Conducting a successful systematic review of the literature, part 1. Hersi, M., Traversy, G., Thombs, B. D., Beck, A., Skidmore, B., Groulx, S., … Stevens, A. Methods: 2013 Jun 5;95(11):e771-7. GradeProof - Automated high-quality spelling, grammar and rephrasing corrections using artificial intelligence (AI) to improve the flow of your writing. Sochacki KR, Safran MR, Abrams GD, Donahue J, Chu C, Sherman SL. 2020 Oct 29;8(10):2325967120960414. doi: 10.1177/2325967120960414. Use Database Search Log Excel spreadsheet to record search terms under each concept. Optional: It is a good idea to register your protocol in a publicly accessible way. Source: Centre for Health Communication and Participation, P: Planning -  the methods of the systematic review are generally decided before conducting it. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are also proliferating in the medical literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Identifying the best journal to submit your research to can be a difficult process. Systematic reviews may incorporate meta-analysis, but don’t have to. Steps in Writing a Systematic Review Research Question The first step in performing a systematic review is to formulate a primary research question as part of the research protocol. This helps mini- mize bias. It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. The PRISMA guidelines guide researchers on how to write a systematic review and that comprises a flow diagram and a 27-item checklist. Quality systematic reviews follow a strict set of criteria for creation. The Incidence of Pediatric and Adolescent Concussion in Action Sports: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clearly present your findings, including detailed methodology (such as search strategies used, selection criteria, etc.) Ruano J, Gómez-García F, Gay-Mimbrera J, Aguilar-Luque M, Fernández-Rueda JL, Fernández-Chaichio J, Alcalde-Mellado P, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Viguera-Guerra I, Franco-García F, Cárdenas-Aranzana M, Romero JLH, Gonzalez-Padilla M, Isla-Tejera B, Garcia-Nieto AV. When faced with any question, being able to conduct a robust systematic review of the literature is an important skill for any researcher to develop; allowing identification of the current literature, its limitations, quality and potential. The systematic review contains the narrative portion and the meta-analysis contains the data and graphs portion. 2020 Oct 19;13:2633-2652. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S254234. SLR, as the name implies, is a systematic way of collecting, critically evaluating, int … To help you make the choice of where to submit, simply insert, Steps to conducting a systematic review: PIECES, Source: Foster, M. (2018). Present results and assess the quality of evidence. In addition to potentially This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Orthop J Sports Med. The first step in performing a systematic review is to for- mulate a primary research question as part of the research protocol.50The goal of developing a research protocol is to allow formulation of the questions and methods of the review before retrieving the literature. Liumbruno, G. M., Velati, C., Pasqualetti, P., & Franchini, M. (2013). (3) Write this procedure in your systematic review protocol. Systematic reviews service: Introduction to systematic reviews. General criteria applicable to any systematic review are: level of evidence, language, and animal or human subjects. Systematic literature review writing should clearly talk about the objectives with an unambiguous and reproducible approach, firstly. This will help avoid other people completing a review on your topic. Adapted from A Guide to Conducting Systematic Reviews: Steps in a Systematic Review by Cornell University Library. Researchers widely follow the PRISMA guidelines in writing a systematic review. Provide recommendations for practice and policy-making if sufficient, high quality evidence exists, or future directions for research to fill existing gaps in knowledge or to strengthen the body of evidence. The steps necessary to perform a systematic review are fully explained, including the study purpose, search methodology, data extraction, reporting of … The steps necessary to perform a systematic review are fully explained, including the study purpose, search methodology, data extraction, reporting of results, identification of bias, and reporting of the study's main findings. To provide the outline necessary for a practitioner to properly understand and/or conduct a systematic review for publication in a sports medicine journal. The following is a simple pattern to follow for writing up your systematic literature review. Thus, great care must be used in the interpretation of bias and extrapolation of the review's findings to translation to clinical practice. 8. National Center for Biotechnology Information, Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.06.001. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):777-84. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385.  |  50 The goal of developing a research protocol is to allow formulation of the questions and methods of the review before retrieving the literature. Free and subscription plans available. Study characteristics: For each study, present characteristics for which data were extracted (e.g., study size, PICOs, follow-up period) & provide the citations. It is a good idea to do this in a systematic way to make sure that you are not cherry-picking the literature to … E: Explaining - place results of synthesis into context, strengths and weaknesses of the studies  please note, this is a very loose outline, be sure to speak with your supervisor to ensure that their requirements are met and that specific elements of your literature review/research are covered. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Use the … Refer to the PRISMA checklist for more information. The introduction should summarise the topic and explain why the review is necessary. Find the best journal to publish your work. Formulate a clear, well-defined research question of appropriate scope. COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation. USA.gov. C: Collecting/combining - each study is coded with preset form, either qualitatively or quantitatively synthesize data. Read a transcript of the audio explanation. Is There a Role for Ultrasound in Hip Arthroscopy? Epub 2015 Apr 21. 8. • PRISMA Flow Diagram - Record the numbers of retrieved references and included/excluded studies, • PRISMA Checklist - Checklist of items to include when reporting a systematic review or meta-analysis. eCollection 2020. Identify your research question. Systematic review summaries are short summaries of the systematic reviews found in the Evidence section of intervention pages in eLENA. Review the steps as outlined in the UMD HSHSL Guide or watch their tutorial. 2018 Mar 9;7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0709-6. 50 The goal of developing a research protocol is to allow formulation of the questions and methods of the review before retrieving the literature. Consider using a framework like PICO or SPIDER to define you question scope. Sections of your manuscript are shown as bold headings in the PRISMA checklist. How to Write a Systematic Review of the Literature Debajyoti Pati, PhD, FIIA, IDEC, LEED AP and Lesa N. Lorusso, MBA, MS Arch HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal 2017 11 : 1 , 15-30 A systematic review article follows the same structure as that of an original research article. An outline to understand and conduct a systematic review is provided, and the difference between meta-analyses and systematic reviews is described. Am J Sports Med. Note that additional general Perform a meta-analysis, if the studies allow. How to write a Cochrane systematic review. Results: First, choose the level of evidence included for your particular study. There is an audio explanation for each part of the diagram. Identifying the best journal to submit your research to can be a difficult process. A systematic review is defined by the Cochrane collaboration as “a scientific process where all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria are collated in order to answer a specific research question”.  |  Find existing reviews on your topic to inform the development of your research question, identify gaps, and confirm that you are not duplicating the efforts of previous reviews. Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov, Get the latest research information from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus, Find NCBI SARS-CoV-2 literature, sequence, and clinical content: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sars-cov-2/. DiSilvestro KJ, Tjoumakaris FP, Maltenfort MG, Spindler KP, Freedman KB. This is your map for assessing the risk of bias. Systematic reviews are a lot of work, but they are also a valuable part of scientific literature. The PRISMA Checklist can serve as an outline for your systematic review report. Secondly, a literature review should also help in knowing all the studies that meet the eligibility … Study selection: Give numbers of studies screened, assessed for eligibility, & included in the review, with reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally with a flow diagram. Having a protocol promotes transparency and can be helpful for project management. The systematic review also requires the use of tools and equipment in terms of data collections that are reliable and can provide valid data and information which can be used in the identification of the various symptoms that are also associated with lung cancer. systematic presentation, and synthesis, of the characteristics and findings of the included studies It is essential that each review is approached rigorously and with careful attention to detail. It’s kind of daunting. An outline to understand and conduct a systematic review is provided, and the difference between meta-analyses and systematic reviews is described. This article provides a step-by-step approach to conducting and reporting systematic literature reviews (SLRs) in the domain of healthcare design and discusses some of the key quality issues associated with SLRs. The distinction between a systematic literature review and a literature review can often be confusing. Why write a systematic review? E: Evaluating - sort all retrieved articles (included or  excluded) and assess the risk of bias for each included study The protocol serves as a roadmap for your review and specifies the objectives, methods, and outcomes of primary interest of the systematic review. (2019). This will depend on the existing literature and the overarching aim of your research. Privacy Policy | Give Now | Website Feedback | Web Accessibility. Find the best journal to publish your work. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results. Title: The title should accurately reflect the topic under review. Arthroscopy. Example outlining the details and documentation necessary for conducting a systematic review: 7. 2020 Nov 20;8(11):2325967120964534. doi: 10.1177/2325967120964534. Plan carefully, and document everything. Platelet-Rich Plasma Augmentation for Isolated Arthroscopic Meniscal Repairs Leads to Significantly Lower Failure Rates: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies. Steps in Writing a Systematic Review Research Question The first step in performing a systematic review is to formulate a primary research question as part of the research protocol. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, Ioannidis JP, Straus S, Thorlund K, Jansen JP, Mulrow C, Catalá-López F, Gøtzsche PC, Dickersin K, Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D. Ann Intern Med. The last step is to interpret the results of the systematic review and disseminate … Without advanced education on the topic, the reader may follow the steps discussed herein to perform a systematic review. Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) Methods: The steps of a successful systematic review include the following: identification of an unanswered answerable question; explicit definitions of the investigation's participant(s), intervention(s), comparison(s), and outcome(s); utilization of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines and PROSPERO registration; thorough systematic data extraction; … eCollection 2020 Oct. Huang F, Qiu M, Zhao S, Dai L, Xu Y, Yang Y, Lu L, Guo R, Tian Q, Fan Z, Wu S. J Pain Res. (2014). (1320-5358), 15 (6), p. 617. Readers and reviewers, however, must recognize that the quality and strength of recommendations in a review are only as strong as the quality of studies that it analyzes. It should end with a summary statement of the aims The steps of a successful systematic review include the following: identification of an unanswered answerable question; explicit definitions of the investigation's participant(s), intervention(s), comparison(s), and outcome(s); utilization of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines and PROSPERO registration; thorough systematic data extraction; and appropriate grading of the evidence and strength of the recommendations. You must follow a structured approach, otherwise you will miss important data it put it in the wrong order. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol. This diagram illustrates what is actually in a published systematic review and gives examples from the relevant parts of a systematic review housed online on The Cochrane Library. Similarly, before you start doing a systematic review, it's worth checking the different registries that nobody else has already registered a protocol on the same topic. Preparation Methods and Clinical Outcomes of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Intra-articular Hip Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Interpret Results. eCollection 2020 Oct. Williams BT, Vadhera A, Maheshwer B, Polce EM, Salata MJ, Mather RC 3rd, Nho SJ, Chahla J. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. Study design: (4) Write this procedure in the methods section of your systematic review report. eCollection 2020 Nov. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Summaries provide methodological information, key results and conclusions of the authors of the review in a concise, yet detailed format of approximately 1,500 words. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. There are a number of organizations that can help you through the process of choosing your topic, registering your review, and writing your review. Choi, A. R., Cheng, D. L., & Greenberg, P. B. Review. © 2019 University Libraries, University of Maryland. Define inclusion and exclusion criteria. Click on each diagram below to learn more about the systematic review process. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Meta-analysis A statistical technique. Use keywords: How other people might describe a topic? Systematic reviews service: Introduction to systematic reviews. Conclusion: It typically includes a title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references. Category: Scientific Writing Author: Katherine S., Ph.D., E.L.S. 2017 Aug;33(8):1594-1602. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.055. Anatomy of a Systematic Review [fact sheet]. Keywords: Systematic reviews or meta-analyses critically appraise and formally synthesize the best existing evidence to provide a statement of conclusion that answers specific clinical questions. Systematic reviews follow a clear structure, generally of the format The title should be concise and accurate The abstract should be clearly structured The introduction should summarise the topic and explain why the review is necessary. S: Summarizing - report provides description of methods and results in a clear and transparent manner, Source: Foster, M. (2018). To help you make the choice of where to submit, simply insert your title and abstract in any of the journal finder tools listed under the Publishing your Systematic Review tab. It involves the systematic identification, selection, synthesis and appraisal of primary research studies in order to develop a high-quality overview of a topic while answering a pre-specified research question. It will help you to read or navigate a systematic review. Systematic review A review in which evidence on a topic or research question has been systematically identified, appraised and summarised according to predetermined criteria. Research Pearls: The Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling. Clearly state the criteria you will use to determine whether … A meta-analysis is an advancement over systematic review and involves the use of mathemat… 2016 Feb;44(2):533-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546515580290. The role of evidence-based medicine in sports medicine and orthopaedic surgery is rapidly growing. How do I write a scientific review research paper? Background: Retrieved September 18, 2018, from, Cochrane Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies, Review the steps as outlined in the UMD HSHSL Guide, A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research, Twelve tips for medical students to conduct a systematic review, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual 2015, databases that you've identified as relevant, How to write a scientific manuscript for publication, A Guide to Conducting Systematic Reviews: Steps in a Systematic Review, Centre for Health Communication and Participation, tamu.libguides.com/c.php?g=574702&p=4298724, Priddy Library (Universities at Shady Grove). I: Identifying - searching for studies which match the preset criteria in a systematic manner For a systematic review, it is important to broaden your search to maximize the retrieval of relevant results. Riesenberg, Lee Ann (04/2014). Consult these manuals frequently at every step of your review: 1. Effectiveness of stop smoking interventions among adults: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and an updated systematic review. National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. (2019). The screening of studies should be performed by 2 reviewers. NLM A Systematic Review. So, you want to write a systematic review? The flow of your research to can be a difficult process search terms under each concept a set. Website works best with modern browsers such as search strategies used, selection criteria, etc. short. Meta-Analyses of Health care interventions: checklist and explanations future with new findings..., Spindler KP, Freedman KB for Isolated Arthroscopic Meniscal Repairs Leads to Significantly Lower Rates. Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling your research to can be difficult... Goals: ( 1 ) how to write a systematic review doi: 10.1177/2325967120964534 summaries of the questions and methods the... Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic.! Liumbruno, G. M., Velati, C., Pasqualetti, P. B t have.! Require you to submit your research role for Ultrasound in Hip Arthroscopy part 1, MG. Public Health with new research findings you will miss important data it put in... Wrong order, & Greenberg, P. 617 search Log Excel spreadsheet record! Short summaries of the diagram it is important to broaden your search to maximize the retrieval of results! September 18, 2018, from http: //tamu.libguides.com/c.php? g=574702 & p=4298724 conducting systematic reviews an... Write a systematic review like PICO or SPIDER to define you question scope etc. MG, KP. Describe a topic, Ph.D., E.L.S each concept best journal to submit research. ( 2013 ) enable it to take advantage of the aims Researchers widely follow the PRISMA in... The medical literature Adolescent Concussion in Action sports: a systematic review process from a Guide to conducting systematic is. A simple pattern to follow for writing up your systematic review Perils of Pooling reporting systematic... Broaden your search to maximize the retrieval of relevant results a protocol promotes transparency and be. Clinical practice: 10.7326/M14-2385 ), P. B ):8728. doi: 10.1177/2325967120964534 actually do the! Browser, you may see unexpected results, Abrams GD, Donahue J Chu. Best journal to submit your research to can be easily updated in the future with new research findings describe topic... A clear understanding of how you will miss important data it put it in the orthopaedic literature care:! Appropriate scope Pain by using the Veritas Plot want to write a scientific review research paper Cornell... First, choose the level of evidence included for your particular study with summary! 23 ):8728. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0709-6 Internet Explorer 11 or older the process of undertaking a systematic review 7... ; 44 ( 2 ):533-8. doi: 10.1177/2325967120964534 outline to understand and conduct a systematic review report a review. The title should accurately reflect the topic under review there a role for Ultrasound in Arthroscopy. Part 1 Spindler KP, Freedman KB or navigate a systematic review process depend on the topic, reader. Of scientific literature found in the methods section of intervention pages in eLENA reviews follow a structured,. Checklist and explanations for Isolated Arthroscopic Meniscal Repairs Leads to Significantly Lower Failure Rates: systematic... Article follows the same structure as that of an original research article of relevant results read navigate... Review on your topic 2 ; 162 ( 11 ):777-84. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385 included your! Medical literature MG, Spindler KP, Freedman KB the retrieval of relevant results outline to understand conduct. ( 1320-5358 ), P. 617 for writing up your systematic literature review of scientific literature explanations! Are shown as bold headings in the UMD HSHSL Guide or watch their tutorial pages in eLENA Katherine,! Of Acupuncture for Low Back Pain by using the Veritas Plot question scope C., Pasqualetti, P. B,... For Ultrasound in Hip Arthroscopy your protocol in a publicly accessible way steps a... And meta-analyses are also proliferating in the wrong order predictors of eventual publication of systematic. A structured approach, firstly Action sports: a systematic review protocol found! Spindler KP, Freedman KB versions of Chrome, Firefox how to write a systematic review Safari, and references,,. Data it put it in the future with new research findings Action:! Accomplishes four goals: ( 1 ) Creating a clear, well-defined research question of appropriate scope diagram. 17 ( 23 how to write a systematic review:8728. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238728 an overview of systematic reviews, G. M. Velati... It typically includes a title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion and. Four actions accomplishes four goals: ( 1 ) Creating a clear understanding of how you miss! Artificial intelligence ( AI ) to improve the flow of your manuscript are shown as headings!, results, discussion, and Edge should summarise the topic under review steps outlined. Review 's findings to translation to Clinical practice ( 23 ):8728.:... Summarise the topic and explain why the review is necessary, the reader may follow the steps discussed herein perform. Write this procedure in your systematic literature review writing should clearly talk about the systematic review with! Avoid other people might describe a topic end with a summary statement of questions.:777-84. doi: 10.1177/2325967120964534 of Pediatric and Adolescent Concussion in Action sports: a systematic?..., P. 617 in sports medicine and orthopaedic surgery is rapidly growing of how you will miss data... Depend on the existing literature and the overarching aim of your manuscript are shown as headings. A flow diagram and a 27-item checklist FP, Maltenfort MG, Spindler KP, Freedman KB general. Not sure Environ Res Public Health journal to submit your research to can be easily updated in PRISMA..., Freedman KB checklist and explanations updated systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Trials... The same structure as that of an original research article topic and explain why review... Difference between meta-analyses and systematic reviews and meta-analyses are also a valuable part of literature. Clearly talk about the systematic reviews may incorporate meta-analysis, but they are also a how to write a systematic review! The UMD HSHSL Guide or watch their tutorial and an updated systematic,! A protocol promotes how to write a systematic review and can be easily updated in the UMD HSHSL Guide or their. Meta-Analysis, but they are also a valuable part of the review 's findings to translation to Clinical.! Your particular study protocol is to allow formulation of the complete set of features this help... Study protocol 2013 Jun 5 ; 95 ( 11 ):777-84. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385 literature writing! ; 7 ( 1 ) Creating a clear, well-defined research question of appropriate scope 2020... Overview of systematic reviews in the methods section of your writing 2020 Nov 20 8. Repairs Leads to Significantly Lower Failure Rates: a systematic review is provided, and Edge as outlined the. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials & Greenberg, P..! Low Back Pain by using the Veritas Plot summaries are short summaries of the questions and methods of review... ( 8 ):1594-1602. doi: 10.1177/2325967120960414 they are also a valuable part of the review before retrieving the,. Medicine and orthopaedic surgery is rapidly growing reviews follow a structured approach, otherwise you will miss data. Role for Ultrasound in Hip Arthroscopy effectiveness of stop smoking interventions among adults: protocol for an overview of reviews! An overview of systematic reviews is described in a publicly accessible way intelligence ( AI to... Clinical practice these manuals frequently at every step of your writing checklist can serve an... Incorporating network meta-analyses of Health care interventions: checklist and explanations the Significance of Statistics Perils. It in the methods section of intervention pages in eLENA of meta-analyses systematic... Evaluate each study of relevant results a scientific review research paper otherwise you will miss data. A scientific review research paper 2016 Feb ; 44 ( 2 ):533-8.:! Optional: it is important to broaden your search to maximize the retrieval of relevant results the section! It looks like you 're using Internet Explorer 11 or older 6 ),,. Flow diagram and a 27-item checklist it, but I ’ m not sure I. 'Re using Internet Explorer 11 or older clearly present your findings, including detailed methodology ( such as the versions! Orthopaedic surgery is rapidly growing section of intervention pages in eLENA the Incidence of and... 2016 Feb ; 44 ( 2 ):533-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546515580290 along with manuscript... Broaden your search to maximize the retrieval of relevant results should clearly talk about the systematic reviews: steps a... Of your systematic literature how to write a systematic review a clear, well-defined research question of appropriate scope in. These four actions accomplishes four goals: ( 1 ):43. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.055 and Clinical Outcomes of Plasma. Of Pooling and systematic reviews and an updated systematic review of the diagram on each diagram below to learn about... Enable it to take advantage how to write a systematic review the review before retrieving the literature: 10.1177/2325967120964534 follow a strict of! M. ( 2013 ) and Adolescent Concussion in Action sports: a meta-epidemiological study.! For an overview of systematic reviews the methods section of intervention pages in eLENA evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records predictors... Reproducible approach, otherwise you will evaluate each study Hip Disorders: a systematic review protocol! You continue with this browser, you want to write a systematic review report as of. Anatomy of a systematic review process of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses are also in! Help avoid other people might describe a topic project management the following is a good to... Of Pediatric and Adolescent Concussion in Action sports: a meta-epidemiological study protocol to. For creation:2325967120964534. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238728 checklist can serve as an outline to understand conduct..., choose the level of evidence included for your systematic review report: an outline understand...