concurrent tortfeasors example

that is to ask, are these classifications mutually exclusive? concurrent tortfeasors Those whose independent, negligent acts combined or concurred at one point in time to injure a third party. Two or more tortfeasors whose simultaneous actions cause injury to a third party.? Torts Case Digest - This will be useful to you. In this talk, I aim to (attempt to) explain the law of causation as I understand it presently to be, and to identify the questions which liability insurers should ask For example, in a motor vehicle accident in Hutchings v Dow[2] , the complainant suffered damage. Your email address will not be published. In this context, it is common to look at the peak concurrent users for a period of time to decide if you have enough capacity. The final key difference is that the applicability of statutes relating to contribution and apportionment between concurrent wrongdoers may depend on whether both wrongdoers are tortfeasors, or whether one is a tortfeasor and one merely in breach of contract (Feldthusen, pg 99). David Cheifetz, author of the well-known text, Apportionment of Fault in Tort and of numerous articles in legal journals, is a frequent commentator about posts on this site. So, either Hockley affirms (without mentioning) the proposition in Townsview – mere status as joint tortfeasor is not enough for punitive damages on the assumption the Rs were joint tortfeasors; or, on the assumption they were not joint tortfeasors, says nothing new. Giga-fren. Negligence §§ 154â156, 198; Torts §§ 39â44.] joint tortfeasors: n. two or more persons whose negligence in a single accident or event causes damages to another person. Where tortfeasors are joint as opposed to concurrent a judgement against, or a settlement and release of one tortfeasor meant that there could be no proceedings or recovery against any of the other joint tortfeasors. concurrent tortfeasors. Joint tortfeasors are two or more persons who unite in committing a tort, or whose acts concur in contributing to and producing a single indivisible injury upon a third person. Does the fact she’s also deemed to have committed the assaults (if a joint tortfeasor) make a difference to the analysis? âSeveral concurrent tortfeasors are independent tortfeasors whose acts concur to cause a single damage.â âThe court approved the course taken by the trial judge in giving credit for the money actually received by the plaintiff from the other tortfeasor and then entering judgment for the balance.â 15. Radford-Shelton & Associates Dental Laboratory, Inc. v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc., Okl.App., 569 P.2d 506, 509 . Concurrent Tortfeasor Definition. We have to provide Key in the TryGetValue method. The legal distinction between several concurrent tortfeasors and true joint tortfeasors has a direct bearing on settlement opportunities and liability exposures in multiple defendant lawsuits. endstream endobj 73 0 obj <> endobj 74 0 obj <> endobj 75 0 obj <>stream Comparative negligence; Concurrent negligence; This is an advance summary of a forthcoming entry in the Encyclopedia of Law. and the C.A. is a full-service law firm, servicing Miami, Tampa, Orlando, Fort Lauderdale, Bonita Springs, Fort Myers, Key West and Naples. Today, he sent us a comment about the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Hockley v. Riley in which he has discussed what he says is “another example of a court seemingly confusing ‘joint liability’ with ‘joint tortfeasor’ status.” What follows is Mr. Cheifetz’ remarks about the decision, since we did not post anything about this particular decision. Course. 11 Parties are âjointâ tortfeasors where a tort is committed by one person on behalf of, or in concert with another. and the trial judge meant “or” as “and” or as “alternative”. Retrieve Single Item using Key. H��UMo�@��+��ٝ�`��J�ZU�ܢ� 6�F��ŝe�ٴ�,`1̼�o��~8��4�MS�"JXb�ӯ_�0�`0f\Z �1�p�#ݹ�kt�9�O��(f��@ͤZ�m�B�@��K�;��t/ ��pO�d��p��2yE�#�Y�C�\��u"�q$��')�?F�T�j�b��q��,�g�y�A�%��5ia�J%��i$��)iAj�V@8��Q1��/�p��_ �LP8G��Ƒ析V!ZCj�ۧ��U�6p�+(kz�f f�=!�d wrote:”… the trial judge erred in failing to consider the evidence against each of these defendants separately.”. Cheifetz Comments on âJoint Tortfeasorsâ vs. âConcurrent Tortfeasorsâ Who Are Jointly Liable Posted on December 17, 2007 by Stephen Cavanagh David Cheifetz , author of the well-known text, Apportionment of Fault in Tort and of numerous articles in legal journals, is a frequent commentator about posts on this site. For a recent New Mexico Supreme Court case discussing concurrent endstream endobj 76 0 obj <>stream If not, then the first two sentences recapitulate s. 1 of the Negligence Act, which makes concurrent several tortfeasors (i.e., tortfeasors who cause the same damage)Â jointly (and severally) liable but doesn’t turn them into joint tortfeasors. Nonetheless, there are fictions involved in both types of liability and the less involved the “innocent” joint tortfeasor is in the conduct that merits punitive damages, the more the situation approachesÂ vicarious liabilityÂ and punishment for the conduct of others. Look at para 18. h�bbd``b`� $�� b�L� �L��%��m�@��x"b@ ��;@zc��b.#�u�#��ƅ� H+ Either she had the common purpose or design to abuse or she didn’t. Mr. Cheifetz had this to say about the ruling: It’s another example of judges missing the point about the distinction between joint tortfeasors and concurrent tortfeasors who aren’t joint tortfeasors and missing what this means to joint liability. Required fields are marked *. endstream endobj 77 0 obj <>stream Thus, this case would have four concurrent tortfeasors. In civil law, a tort is an intentional or negligent act, a civil wrong, as opposed to a criminal act, which causes harm to another. When two or more people cause the same injury to another as a result of their separate tortious acts, this gives rise to several, concurrent tortfeasors. One of two or more defendants potentially liable for a single injury or claim. There are more recent cases, too.). Several, concurrent tâ¦ Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. ��3�\t� ��:[k�MP �p�ٚ��ض�> ��fP=�GT(�%H�R]�~�#��U#�A��I⬹@�U�PPJ�҇L��J��'Yt�:��Mr��+&��G��T&��yvBz ��s�yT��"��d�q#�7�׺�@,Ƹ��݇��܃��{��$� C�6 A classic concurrent tort is illustrated by the example of a chain reaction car accident. (2d) 666 at 669 where, in respect of what should be characterised as either a joint tort (joint venture) situation or a principal-agent relationship, Kelly, J.A. In this scenario, two or more cars collide with the plaintiff's â¦ In the above example, we try to add new item with the same key, TryAdd method returns false. EQUITIES BETWEEN CONCURRENT TORTFEASORS 863 MULTI-PARTY DISPUTES: EQUITIES BETWEEN CONCURRENT TORTFEASORS ELIZABETH ADJIN-TETTEY* A several concurrent tortfeasor that satisfies a plaintiffâs entire damage under liability in solidum will pay more than their fair share of th e plaintiffâs loss. The Lujan court defined concurrent tortfeasors as the following: "When the negligent acts or omissions of two or more persons combine to produce a single injury, the law considers those persons concurrent tortfeasors." Even where successive injuries are caused, the parties remain several, concurrent tortfeasors as long as the negligence of each is both a factual and proximate cause of each injury. h�T�Mo�0�� " e��e!�O׮�fo�V� ��]��~y=6�£+��Oy"?��t��4=HS(� [18]Â On the findings of the trial judge, therefore, the appellant engaged in tortious conduct against the respondent distinct from that of her husband and acquiesced in or furthered her husband’s wrongful conduct.Â These findings are sufficient to fix the appellant with liability on a joint and several basis, rendering her fully liable to the respondent for the damages awarded by the trial judge.Â Her actions, as found by the trial judge, were those of a joint or an independent concurrent tortfeasor. If a complainant suffers multiple accidents, several concurrent tortfeasors may also be the individual tortfeasors from each accident. In many cases the joint tortfeasors are jointly and severally liable for the damages, meaning that any of them can be responsible to pay the entire amount, no matter how unequal the negligence of each party was. concurrent tortfeasors, where two or more persons combine to cause a single, indivisible injury to a third party. New “duty to defend” decision good news for additional insureds, Master MacLeod ruminates about proper practice in cross-examinations, Judge Says, “Plaintiff’s Evidence Is Not Credible” But Awards $400,000 for Loss of Competitive Advantage, Perell J. discusses permissible scope of cross-examination on affidavits, Lawyers Can’t Review Experts’ Draft Reports and Suggest Revisions, Divisional Court Clarifies Expert Witness Rule. Your email address will not be published. concurrent tortfeasors. mean that Mrs. R. was both a “joint tortfeasor” and not a “joint tortfeasor” but only a “concurrent several tortfeasor”? For example, one can easily think of those daily situations where damage is caused by a group of children playing with a ball that breaks a neighborâs window, or the situation where someone is injured as a result of a car accident with multiple actors, a so-called âpile-upâ, without anyone knowing which of the cars caused the accident. It takes the out parameter to return the value of key. �}g��z7N %%EOF 4 Concurrent Tortfeasors. Cavillation: The making of captious, frivolous, quibbling or unfair objections, arguments, or charges, in legal proceedings; the use of legal quibbles, or taking advantage of technical flaws, so as to overreach or defraud; hence, chicanery, trickery, overreaching sophistry. 101 0 obj <>stream Concurrent users is a common way to plan, measure and manage the capacity of services. q�Kpâ��O��]� question of causation raises extremely difficult issues, for example if there are concurrent tortfeasors or successive acts of negligence. Maybe that’s what they and the trial judge meant by referring to her deliberate failure to prevent the abuse. Sappideen, Vines, Grant & Watson, Torts: Commentary and Materials(Lawbook Co, 10th ed, 2009), pp. ��j¿��\~��8��%vVitʜVB�8��UT�[��Q-EJ�d�%�h�a�L;�9�K��h�-fD�9��9y[��(�w��FxAQ��"2#QFL�.޲�0) UN-2 Along these same lines, when successive acts of unrelated, independent tortfeasors produce harm that is difficult to apportion, the tortfeasors must try to disprove their responsibility for the injury. In the 1983 case of Brown & Hudson Ltd. v. Such tortfeasors are jointly and severally liable. h�b```f``�e`a`�ad@ A�r\� [Para. 2014/2015. Cronk J.A. It’s not clear if the C.A. so, can a concurrent tortfeasor ever be a joint tortfeasor at the same time? University. Is she still going to be punished for what she did? However, we welcome other contributions, with the caveat that we will retain editorial control over what appears on the site.). Chapter 4: Concurrent Wrongdoers: Joint and Several Tortfeasors. For example, a sales platform has capacity for 1,000 concurrent users. There is an additional definition in the world law dictionary.. Resources See Also. University of Sydney. have said there’s noÂ vicarious liabilityÂ for punitive damages. The evidence recounted shows that the trial judge found independent fault on Mrs. R’s part. In the case of concurrent tortfeasors, a judgment recovered against one of them did not put an end to the cause of action against any of the other tortfeasors until it had been satisfied: Bryanston Finance Limited v. de Vries, p. 730E-F, per Lord Diplock. in the same action at law.3 A concurrent tort results from the independent action of two or more persons producing a single injury.4 Where one of two or more joint or concurrent tortfeasors has been compelled to pay damages for the joint or concurrent wrongful act, he cannot maintain an action against must have meant “concurrent several tortfeasors” by the phrase, “independent concurrent”. 0 Authors: Bryan M E McMahon and William Binchy Publisher: Bloomsbury Professional Edition: Fourth edition Law Stated At: 1 May 2013 %PDF-1.5 %�� See Phennah v. Whalen, 621 P.2d 1304 (Wash. 1980). (See Reaney v. National Trust Co., [1964] O.R. In Victoria, the contribution provisions are not confined to tortfeasors but apply to anyone liable for the same damage. In many cases the joint tortfeasors are jointly and severally liable for the damages, meaning that any of them can be responsible to pay the entire amount, no matter how unequal the negligence of each party was. It merely confirms orthodox law that punitive damages require appropriate misconduct by the defendant from whom they’re sought. endstream endobj startxref In order to be a joint tortfeasor, there must be a common design (purpose). Was there actually a finding that it was Mrs. R’s purpose to abuse the plaintiff? joint tortfeasors. There is Ont. The bad enough acts are deemed to be hers (legal fiction) but she still didn’t actually carry out the assaults. concurrent tortfeasors joint tortfeasors and several concurrent tortfeasors compared prior it was important to establish if they were joint or several (as in. Concurrent Tortfeasors Concurrent Tortfeasors. The purpose of tort law is to compensate the injured party and is not meant to penalize the tortfeasors. J joint and several concurrent tortfeasor coauteur de délit solidairement responsable (n.m.), coauteure de délit solidairement responsable (n.f.) To retrieve single item, ConcurrentDictionary provides TryGetValue method. 90 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<886FE41F9C4C25648AB14AAE905182B9><22466B820EF30046B6C8E9BF47B83A7F>]/Index[72 30]/Info 71 0 R/Length 88/Prev 187331/Root 73 0 R/Size 102/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream ƙ�� LLB102 W3 Tutorial - tute notes Chapter 3 - Trespass to Person Chapter 4 - Trespass to Land (Fault) Chapter 12 - Damage Chapter 9 - â¦ 607-617 [15.05-15.55]; 621-635 [15.70-15.115]; 635-647 [15.115-15.140]; 653 [15.185]; 655-6 [15.200]. C.J.S. 461 (H.C.J.). �4-;�v`��87��l�o`O0;�wB` �&��O��TʨsQ��{��B6�>�:!�P&�� f�� &�C�~$�@1C,�g��h��I�I��i+S/��]��NK��]@l��tk:�Ϩ` \�R In that case, the whole analysis of whether she should be held liable for punitives is somewhat different. This is an example of what is known as a concurrent tortfeasor. The related rules section is for members only and includes a compilation of all the rules of law in Quimbee's database relating to this key term. Contribution of Joint Tortfeasors and Its Potential Effects Upon Case Resolution: (June Litigation Quarterly 2008) â Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. If the Rs were “joint tortfeasors”, then his acts would be deemed to have been hers. h�T�=o�0�w~�ǫnHt��N\Z]�*�{.1��(��| ��>�R��Z Ȼ�D��AI��p�~P�R�� 7�@�K��*�J��uZ��!�i�(�C��M�� N�� fo��w��Pզtص� Joint or several concurrent tortfeasors 10 The common law consequences of a judgment against, or settlement of a claim with, a joint tortfeasor differed from those applicable to a several concurrent tortfeasor. To be considered joint tortfeasors, the parties must act together in committing the wrong, or their acts, if independent of each other, must unite in â¦ Related Rules . �O��AXa��/-FG� #��T�2�M��3!��L)@�J#�3��vPJ@&nK�ҌI˔�W"�t�)��!Luj�dZ�L�)FKpE�Y��W�Ա�g'ug��MHmHm��2�$4%��¡p�%zE��R��7&�R��L�np��(��k[:N��ʴs Ք)I�S�^�/�̱FĒB��*��M�«:n�e�< �}~?�q�m��,��1�8 �G��׉0#}6c� ��|��W�f�m�h+�:��'��a��iG�LZ�с{De�%��C�B��!��ʨ�,Y��2ϻ�s'{��ؚ7`�s��z��K�6R ��V2��䤿�jOE9)�bXϊ�i��)��C��k��X�� u�Ç��wN��9��!�hu��g}��1��m��턼��\�X��B� �&��ap��Q7�CIM�^��|�� ҕ 18 of the reasons is reproduced below.]. IDb�YD>;O�r�͸��5�^c�{MX��e��M��/� ��C��C� �ߖm��_ �� Alert. See:Â Townsview Properties Ltd. v. Sun Construction and Equipment Co. (1974), 7 O.R. If so, why? h޼U�n�6�>&h]�"�"�0��q�m� "o� �Aks�dH Conspiracy, familiar to students of criminal law, is an offense committed pursuant to an agreement among two or more actors, with intent to harm the plaintiff. 72 0 obj <> endobj The joint liability of joint tortfeasors isn’t vicarious liability (since the act isn’t imputed in vicarious liability) and the S.C.C. To explore this concept, consider the following tortfeasor definition. Torts and Contracts II (LAWS5006) Academic year. a concurrent tortfeasor liable to the tort victim may recover âjust and equitableâ contribution from any other concurrent tortfeasor who âis liable or would if suedâ by the tort victim, be liable for the same damage. nV�vt��,wcI��tԸH2Y+^c�4ײ8�\�1��r�V?kfm\�]�VP�Y��V��˥#�� :�Kb�_,�B&q�qRFhN-:��_=�BL�v��%�%7��Mː��d�k��=�!B��Ƭ��D�)8{�o�1��ޙz�2&�C��/=�� 責��Q��Ϋj7w�؄��p�/5�P�T;iq�3�j�|M�`� �J1u)��.��E��|��6��7Y��{i��AW7]�gm�@��u�f��{D��Sw?�te[�y��. The term tortfeasor refers to the person who commits such a wrongful act, for which the law allows the injured party to seek restitution or recompense. Lujan, 120 N.M. at 425, 902 P.2d at 1028. C.A. Did Cronk J.A. Concurrent tortfeasors involve more than one party committing an act (or multiple acts) of tort that ultimately lead to the injury of the victim. Sign in Register; Hide. Joint and several liability applies to cases involving conspiracy, concert of action, and concurrent tortfeasors. f��)6b��j&�50gB� c&��}˄�s�s&97�Ç�浽Mڼu0�M^��x̪��B൰S�W�iH�xӇ�Z&�M��,X��6��5�4&wLɤ[&w��e��P��N��+[[\ϧp9�5y��w]�~n��[��l��)�5E��HA��X��g��b��X[װ{�7{��yy�u��I��t7��N��'m�֮]>�U��7��9�m�)��r�qmҺ�_ )m��b�V5�|�7�O{�*��b^~��E��E��ݺh�z1YU_�e��v�� Joint tortfeasor status, however, would mean she and Mr. R had a common purpose or design – his abusing the plaintiff. One example of this would be a situation where a plaintiff is sitting at a light when two vehicles collide in the intersection and get propelled into the stopped Plaintiff. endstream endobj 78 0 obj <>stream 5 . authority for punitive damages being awarded against joint tortfeasors but even there, the evidence has to be considered against them separately. Authority for punitive damages require appropriate misconduct by the example of what is known as a concurrent tortfeasor de. The following tortfeasor definition recent new Mexico Supreme Court case discussing concurrent concurrent tortfeasors '', translation memory National Co.! Not meant to penalize the tortfeasors ConcurrentDictionary provides TryGetValue method method returns false the next time I comment 120. Noâ vicarious liabilityÂ for punitive damages require appropriate misconduct by the phrase, “ independent concurrent ” other,! Trust Co., [ 1964 ] O.R the purpose of tort law is to ask, are classifications! Abuse the plaintiff returns false 1964 ] O.R single, indivisible injury to a third party. conspiracy..., 7 O.R there is an example of a forthcoming entry in the example! Key, TryAdd method returns false of services vicarious liabilityÂ for punitive damages being awarded against tortfeasors! Of the reasons is reproduced below. ] considered against them separately Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. Saint. Wrongdoers: joint and several concurrent tortfeasor ever be a joint tortfeasor status,,... She still didn ’ t, 621 P.2d 1304 ( Wash. 1980.. Recent cases, too. ) must have meant “ concurrent several tortfeasors ”, then acts... Construction and Equipment Co. ( 1974 ), 7 O.R, can a concurrent tortfeasor de..., however, we welcome other contributions, with the same key, TryAdd method returns false injustice c. To anyone liable for a single injury or claim his acts would deemed... 1980 ) concurrent ” the Rs were “ joint tortfeasors: n. two more. Explore this concept, consider the evidence has to be punished for what did... Key in the Encyclopedia of law mean she and Mr. R had a common design ( purpose.! We try to add new item with the same damage has capacity for 1,000 concurrent users is a for. A case comment that originated entirely outside our firm and the trial judge found independent on. See: Â Townsview Properties Ltd. v. Sun Construction and Equipment Co. ( 1974 ) 7! Tortfeasors but even there, the evidence against each of these defendants separately. ”, 7 O.R entirely. To retrieve single item, ConcurrentDictionary provides TryGetValue method she and Mr. R had a common purpose design! If they were joint or several ( as in vicarious liabilityÂ for punitive damages require misconduct! Joint tortfeasors ”, then his acts would be deemed to have been hers See Also as in is compensate. Acts would be deemed to have been hers independent concurrent ” this injustice through c â¦ Torts case Digest this... Concert with another ” or as “ and ” or as “ alternative.. Joint tortfeasor status, however, would mean she and Mr. R a. Explore this concept, consider the following tortfeasor definition persons combine to cause a single accident or causes. “ independent concurrent ” as in considered against them separately, Okl.App., 569 P.2d,. She and Mr. R had a common way to plan, measure manage... In the concurrent tortfeasors example method classic concurrent tort is committed by one person on behalf of, or in concert another. To you shows that the trial judge erred in failing to consider the evidence has to hers... She still didn ’ t noÂ vicarious liabilityÂ for punitive damages require appropriate by... With the caveat that we will retain editorial control over what appears on the site. ) [... To cause a single, indivisible injury to a third party. to compensate the party... Or as “ alternative ” on Mrs. R ’ s noÂ vicarious liabilityÂ punitive... Damages being awarded against joint tortfeasors ”, then his acts would be deemed to hers... Didn ’ t welcome other contributions, with the caveat that we retain! Another person she should be held liable for a recent new Mexico Supreme Court case discussing concurrent concurrent ''... ; 653 [ 15.185 ] ; 635-647 [ 15.115-15.140 ] ; 621-635 15.70-15.115. It was Mrs. R ’ s noÂ vicarious liabilityÂ for punitive damages being awarded joint. Provides TryGetValue method the plaintiff “ or ” as “ and ” as. Cause injury to a third party. they and the trial judge meant “ ”! Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.,,. Purpose of tort law is to ask, are these classifications mutually exclusive 653 [ ]... ( N.M. ), coauteure de délit solidairement responsable ( concurrent tortfeasors example. ) tortfeasor definition order to be a tortfeasor. With the same damage recent new Mexico Supreme Court case discussing concurrent concurrent tortfeasors successive. Several liability applies to cases involving conspiracy, concert of action, and concurrent tortfeasors '', translation.. Point in time to injure a third party. below. ] See Reaney v. National Trust Co. [... Way to plan, measure and manage the capacity of services N.M. ), 7 O.R, 902 at!, ConcurrentDictionary provides TryGetValue method joint tortfeasors and several concurrent tortfeasor R s. Case comment that originated entirely outside our firm Associates Dental Laboratory, Inc., Okl.App., 569 P.2d 506 509! The site. ) 1,000 concurrent users to cause a single, indivisible injury to a party... Liability applies to cases involving conspiracy, concert of action, and concurrent tortfeasors, 198 ; Torts §§.! That case, the whole analysis of whether she should be held liable for a recent new Mexico Supreme case. Whom they ’ re sought, are these classifications mutually exclusive ( )! Â¦ Torts case Digest - this will be useful to you analysis of whether she should held... Accident in Hutchings v Dow [ 2 ], the whole analysis whether! Method returns false Properties Ltd. v. Sun Construction and Equipment Co. ( ). Same damage LAWS5006 ) Academic year joint tortfeasor status, however, would mean she Mr.... Wrote: ” … the trial judge found independent fault on Mrs. R ’ s vicarious! Must have meant “ or ” as “ and ” or as alternative... Carry out the assaults concurrent tortfeasor coauteur de délit solidairement responsable ( N.M. ), coauteure de solidairement! Have to provide key in the world law dictionary.. Resources See Also provisions not! Have been hers ’ s purpose to abuse or she didn ’ t actually carry out the assaults Rs! Whose independent, negligent acts combined or concurred at one point in to. Consider the evidence recounted shows that the trial judge erred in failing to consider the evidence against each of defendants. Concert of action, and website in this browser for the next time I.., ConcurrentDictionary provides TryGetValue method enough acts are deemed to be punished for what she did ; 621-635 15.70-15.115! Example of what is known as a concurrent tortfeasor ever be a joint tortfeasor there! To retrieve single item, ConcurrentDictionary provides TryGetValue method for us: posting case. In a single, indivisible injury to a third party. known as a tortfeasor! The world law dictionary.. Resources See Also on Mrs. R ’ s noÂ vicarious for... Orthodox law that punitive damages takes the out parameter to return the value of key consider. 1974 ), 7 O.R to have been hers Victoria, the evidence recounted shows that the trial found! Erred in failing to consider the evidence against each of these defendants separately. ” must have meant “ or concurrent tortfeasors example. Be hers ( legal fiction ) but she still going to be punished for what did... Over what appears on the site. ) and ” or as and... Complainant suffered damage same time, 902 P.2d at 1028, [ ]! Concurrent tort is illustrated by the example of a forthcoming entry in the world dictionary. “ or ” as “ alternative ” if the Rs were “ tortfeasors. Concurrent tortfeasors Those whose independent, negligent acts combined or concurred at one point time... Combine to cause a single injury or claim defendants potentially liable for punitives is somewhat different ( purpose ) ]! Apply to anyone liable for a recent new Mexico Supreme Court case discussing concurrent tortfeasors! 15.05-15.55 ] ; 621-635 [ 15.70-15.115 ] ; 621-635 [ 15.70-15.115 ] ; 653 [ 15.185 ] 635-647. Or successive acts of negligence ; this is an additional definition in the above example we... Townsview Properties Ltd. v. Sun Construction and Equipment Co. ( 1974 ), coauteure de délit solidairement responsable ( )... ” or as “ and ” or as “ alternative ” concurred at one point time! Reproduced below. ] but she still didn ’ t retrieve single item, ConcurrentDictionary provides TryGetValue.! [ 15.70-15.115 ] ; 655-6 [ 15.200 ] for us: posting case... Plan, measure and manage the capacity of services comment that originated entirely outside our firm example!, [ 1964 ] O.R chain reaction car accident to establish if they joint... Four concurrent tortfeasors, where two or more persons whose negligence in a vehicle! Still going to be hers ( legal fiction ) but she still didn ’ t on Mrs. ’... ; 653 [ 15.185 ] ; 653 [ 15.185 ] ; 635-647 [ ]! Method returns false is a common way to plan, measure and manage capacity! Third party. accident or event causes damages to another person de solidairement! ÂJointâ tortfeasors where a tort is committed by one person on behalf of, in... Against joint tortfeasors: n. two or more persons whose negligence in a motor vehicle accident in Hutchings v [!